Imagine stepping into a time machine with two possible destinations. On one side, you fast-forward two weeks and step out holding a fully functional AI MVP ready to test in the market. On the other, you leap six months ahead only to find… a high-cost prototype that still isn't launch-ready. That's the difference between SpeedMVPs' lightning-fast AI MVPs and the slow grind of traditional development paths.
14–21 days
vs 5–6 months
Fully functional MVP, market-ready
vs Clickable demo or partial feature set
Direct spend on working product features
vs High burn on design, research, and idle dev time
Immediate testing, traction, and possible revenue
vs No ROI until full dev cycle is restarted
Lower risk — validated early
vs Higher risk — long build before user validation
Real-world data in weeks
vs Hypotheses remain untested for months
In the age of AI, building slow is riskier than building fast
Market opportunities vanish if you hesitate
Why prototype for six months when you can launch in two weeks?
Let real users shape your product from day one
SpeedMVPs has already built the time machine for MVP delivery
The future doesn't wait — neither should your AI MVP